Las Vegas will host the first-ever “Steroid Olympics” this Sunday, when 42 elite athletes—including Olympic medalists—will compete in swimming, track, and weightlifting while using performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) under medical supervision. Backed by Donald Trump Jr.’s investment firm and German billionaire Christian Angermayer, the Enhanced Games defy global anti-doping norms, offering $25 million in prize money and a platform to normalize what WADA calls “utterly irresponsible and immoral.”
Who’s Behind the Controversy—and Why It Matters
The Enhanced Games are the brainchild of Christian Angermayer, a billionaire whose portfolio spans biotech, psychedelics, and now sports. His argument? Why limit medicine to treating illness when it can also enhance performance—safely, under clinical oversight? Angermayer, who once paid $40 million for a T-rex skull and now plans to install a triceratops head in his London apartment, sees the games as a “global movement” uniting science and sport. “The old rulebook is gone,” said U.S. Olympic swimmer Cody Miller in a social media post last month, signaling a shift among some athletes. But critics—including the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC)—call it a betrayal of fair competition. As one joint statement from athlete-led commissions put it: “a betrayal of everything that we stand for.”
cluster (priority): The Guardian
Donald Trump Jr.’s involvement adds political weight. His investment firm, 1789 Capital, joined Peter Thiel in leading a $25 million Series B funding round for Enhanced Group in 2025, pushing the company’s stock up 35% in the past week. Trump Jr. framed the games as “the future—real competition, real freedom, and real records being smashed.” Yet the timing couldn’t be more polarizing. With the 2024 Olympics still fresh in memory—and doping scandals lingering—this event risks rewriting the boundaries of what’s acceptable in sport.
The Drugs, the Dollars, and the Defiance
The Enhanced Games aren’t just about breaking records; they’re about breaking rules. Athletes can choose from a menu of PEDs—testosterone esters (used by 91% of participants), human growth hormone (79%), EPO (41%), and anabolic steroids (29%)—all banned by WADA. The catch? These substances are FDA-approved and administered under “safe, responsible, and clinically supervised” conditions, per the company. Winners take home $250,000 per event, with a $1 million bonus for world-record breakers. Last year, Greek swimmer Kristian Gkolomeev earned that bonus after shattering the 50-meter freestyle record under Enhanced’s supervision.
cluster (priority): Yahoo SportsTrump addresses ban on trans athletes from 2028 Olympics in LA
The financial stakes are just as high. Enhanced Group’s stock surged after its SPAC debut, though it’s since dropped 40%—a sign of investor skepticism. Yet the company’s ambitions extend beyond Sunday. It’s launching a line of performance-enhancing supplements, including peptides (like those in GLP-1 weight-loss drugs) and testosterone creams priced at $209. Angermayer’s pitch: Why wait for illness to use medicine? “Should we, as a society, think about how not to get sick in the first place?” he asked in a recent interview with The Guardian. The answer, for now, is a resounding no from anti-doping authorities.
The roster reads like a who’s who of elite sport. Fred Kerley, the 2022 100m world champion and 2024 Olympic silver medalist, will compete on track. Australian swimmer James Magnussen (Olympic silver and bronze) and U.S. gold medalist Cody Miller are also signed on. But here’s the twist: Participation is optional. Of the 42 athletes, 36 took part in a 12-week trial in Abu Dhabi, where they could choose between “enhanced” or “natural” modes. Only two opted out entirely. The rest? They’re betting on science over stigma.
Miller’s social media post—”The old rulebook is gone”—captures the defiance. Yet the reaction from traditional sport is fierce. WADA and the IOC have condemned the games as “indiscriminate use of restricted substances,” while athlete commissions called it “utterly irresponsible and immoral.” The Enhanced Games’ response? They’re not doping—they’re innovating. “Safe, responsible, and clinically supervised use of performance enhancements,” the company insists, framing it as a step toward “personalized enhancement products” for health, performance, and recovery.
What’s at Stake: Money, Science, and the Soul of Sport
The Enhanced Games aren’t just a one-off spectacle. They’re a test of whether sport can—or should—embrace PEDs as a new normal. Angermayer’s vision is clear: This is the future. The $25 million prize pool, the celebrity athletes, and the Vegas spectacle are all designed to draw eyeballs. But the real gamble is cultural. If these games succeed, will they push anti-doping rules to the brink—or collapse them entirely?
cluster (priority): NBC News
Consider the parallels to GLP-1 drugs like Wegovy, which have redefined weight loss. Enhanced is betting that peptides and hormones—once underground—will follow the same trajectory. “The Enhanced Games represent the future,” Trump Jr. said, echoing Angermayer’s belief that society should “think about how not to get sick in the first place.” But for now, the sporting world is divided. WADA’s stance is unequivocal: This is doping, plain and simple. The Enhanced Games’ answer? “The Steroid Olympics” are here to stay.
How to Watch—and What Comes Next
The Enhanced Games kick off Sunday, May 24, in Las Vegas, with events streaming live on Roku Sports Channel (starting at 9 p.m. ET) and the company’s YouTube, Rumble, Twitch, and Kick accounts. The invite-only crowd of 2,500 will also get a post-event show by rock band The Killers. But beyond the spectacle, the bigger question is whether this is a flash in the pan or the start of a movement.
If the games draw massive viewership, Enhanced’s business model—selling PEDs as lifestyle products—could take off. Angermayer’s $209 testosterone cream and $119 peptide treatments are already for sale on the company’s website. But if anti-doping bodies push back harder, legal battles loom. The IOC and WADA have the power to boycott or sanction athletes who participate, though Enhanced has framed this as a private competition outside their jurisdiction.
One thing is certain: The Enhanced Games will be remembered as the moment sport’s doping debate reached a breaking point. Will history judge it as a reckless experiment or a necessary evolution? The answer may depend on who wins—and who’s watching.
